Kate told us about an amazing current event - the design and building of a brand new city in Saudi Arabia... for women only!!
Is this something to celebrate as CHANGE in recognition of women's rights in a society where inequality is so evident, or is it an example of CONTINUING gender segregation?
See her full report for more information and how it relates to the Society and Culture concepts.
Society and Culture at Stella
was created and is updated by Katie Price and students at Stella Maris College, Manly, NSW.
Showing posts with label Continuity and Change. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Continuity and Change. Show all posts
Sunday, 19 August 2012
Monday, 6 August 2012
Olympic Truce Campaign - 'Equal Olympic Opportunity'?!
With all the hype and excitement of the Olympics at the moment, Monica decided to look a little more closely at what issues have arisen in Olympics past and how they are today. A little healthy competition and banter between teams and countries is in full flow at the moment, but it has not always been a positive, internationally harmonious event. Inequality and discrimination has been seen throughout the years the Olympic Games have started from the beginning until now. It was not until 1992 that the world united and everyone from all countries were able to compete in the Olympic Games. The following examples show some of the history:

Monday, 23 April 2012
A real man...
Thanks to Camille for this excellent discussion:
Herein lies our paradox.
Jackson Katz’ book, The Macho
Paradox, profoundly challenges the definition of manhood. Are men real men when
violence against women is involved physically and verbally? Are men programmed
to be violent or are people naturally violent?
Are you a real man? Do you know someone who is a ‘real’ man?
1. Are
they chivalrous and respectful? That’s pretty ‘manly.’
OR
2. Are
they disrespectful to women and constantly put them down? That seems to be
pretty ‘manly’ these days too.
Herein lies our paradox.
Jackson Katz’ book, The Macho
Paradox, profoundly challenges the definition of manhood. Are men real men when
violence against women is involved physically and verbally? Are men programmed
to be violent or are people naturally violent?
Society and culture are
highlighted repeatedly in this book. Concepts of gender and power are major
features, as men fearing women constantly slam women to defend their
‘masculinity.’ Are men brought up this way, passed down by enculturation? Has
violence against women accelerated along with the technology that allows access
to the 10,000 porn videos released in the U.S.A every year? This pattern has
led people to evaluate continuity and change that come with gender violence and
how societies can prevent it.
From Eminem to high school sex
scandals, this type of violence concerns every individual and influences them
to make decisions. This is not a ‘women’s issue’, it is something that men play
a role in too and it should be acknowledged. True manhood most certainly
shouldn’t involve harming of another human being. Jackson Katz’ discusses
hundreds of factors more on this topic from personal experiences to
quantitative data. He also acknowledges the book called the ‘Cinderella
complex’, where it claims that very independent women still desire to be
protected by a male. The gender stereotypes are overwhelming and cease to end!
The Macho Paradox proves to be as complex and puzzling as society and culture
itself.
See the powerpoint accompanying this here.
Tuesday, 3 April 2012
Race in TV
Thanks to Marianne for this review of current issues of race and culture in TV media.
The article relates to society and culture concepts because it highlights cultural stereotypes and the power the media has to dictate what is put on television; people are highly influenced by what we see in the media. This also links to continuity and change because Australia has become a more multicultural country in the last 20 years, so we should therefore portray this image on TV. However, the media still perceives the Australian audience to be intolerant to other races and believes we would rather see white people on TV.
TV networks and advertisers argue that they are worried that
white Australians will tune out if there is more ethnic mix in the media,
despite 2009 census revealing that 44% of Australians are born overseas or have
at least one foreign born parent. Hence, Australia would be more accepting of
other cultures and more ethnic groups might watch shows if they were being
represented on television. A professor of sociology also claims that media are
worried that they may portray ethnic races in a way that people may deem as
offensive and so they stick to the white, ‘mainstream model’.
Read the full article from The Vine.
Major television networks are accused of TV racism as it is
believed that there are few roles on commercial television for people from
Australia’s ethnic mix. Soap operas such as ‘Packed to the Rafters’ and ‘Home
and Away’ are being criticized for ‘Racial Tokenism’ as well as reality game shows
and news/panel/chat shows which are being described as very anglo-centric.
Multicultural Arts Australia also say that when there is racial diversity it
usually depicts cultural stereotypes which is being labelled ‘Colour Blind
Casting’. A lot of ethnic actors are portrayed as the villain, eg Middle Eastern actors are portrayed as drug
dealers and‘Wog criminals.’
Monday, 19 March 2012
Kony 2012 - People Power???
POWER and AUTHORITY: Two key concepts in the Society and Culture course. The Kony 2012 campaign and 'craze' shows big changes in who has power and who influences authority.
A few things to consider:
- Does Kony have power or authority? - or neither? - or both?
- If so, WHY does Kony have power?
- Do Governments (African countries governments, American government, Australian government... and more!) have any power or authority over Kony?
- What sort of power and/or authority does the public have? In Uganda/Africa, in the USA, in Australia, around the world?
- How has the balance of power and authority changed over the last month? To who, from who?
- How has technology influenced this? Do Social Networking sites have any power or authority?
I could go on....
- If the public does have some power - then that includes you... do you feel in a position of power? Do you WANT that power?!!!
Please post more interesting questions in the comments box below!!! Or even your feedback and thoughts on any responses or answers would be even better!!!! :)
A few things to consider:
- Does Kony have power or authority? - or neither? - or both?
- If so, WHY does Kony have power?
- Do Governments (African countries governments, American government, Australian government... and more!) have any power or authority over Kony?
- What sort of power and/or authority does the public have? In Uganda/Africa, in the USA, in Australia, around the world?
- How has the balance of power and authority changed over the last month? To who, from who?
- How has technology influenced this? Do Social Networking sites have any power or authority?
- If the public does have some power - then that includes you... do you feel in a position of power? Do you WANT that power?!!!
Please post more interesting questions in the comments box below!!! Or even your feedback and thoughts on any responses or answers would be even better!!!! :)
Sunday, 18 March 2012
Kony 2012 - the video, the social networks.
KONY 2012: How Social Media Fueled the Most Viral Video of All Time
Source: Yahoo News

In addition, our easy access to information today, i.e. via the internet means that we can easily adn quickly find additional information on something that interests us. Within 24 hours the campaign was initially supported and then questioned as people looked more closely at the issues and background to the Kony 2012 campaign and the Invisible Children Organisation.
Or... is this one aspect of our culture today? That as soon as someone or something becomes successful, there are underlying desires to bring that someone or something down? ... 'Tall poppy syndrome?'....???
KONY 2012 took the social web by storm last week, as a 30-minute documentary seeking to arrest LRA leader Joseph Kony was viewed online nearly 100 million times.
The Pew Internet and American Life Project investigated how KONY 2012 became the most viral video of all time.
The key, Pew found, was 18 to 29-year-olds sharing links on Twitter and Facebook. While initially 77% of Twitter discussions were positive, the tone shifted as criticisms of the non-profit behind the film, Invisible Children, began to circulate.
Maybe this is true: Where did you learn about KONY 2012? Are Twitter and Facebook your go-to sources for current events? I am unfortunately out of that 18-29 age bracket and the first place I learnt about it was from YOU- the students, in lessons at school! And then later on the television news. Maybe this is just one small piece of evidence to back up how information and the power of the media is shifting through time.
In addition, our easy access to information today, i.e. via the internet means that we can easily adn quickly find additional information on something that interests us. Within 24 hours the campaign was initially supported and then questioned as people looked more closely at the issues and background to the Kony 2012 campaign and the Invisible Children Organisation.
Or... is this one aspect of our culture today? That as soon as someone or something becomes successful, there are underlying desires to bring that someone or something down? ... 'Tall poppy syndrome?'....???
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



