"For example; Cinderella why did the Prince choose
her? Why didn’t he give the UGLY step sisters a chance but gave the household maid a chance first up from her looks? Do
all men only go for beautiful looking women and not care about what comes with
it? We also see in the movies every successful male is always the strongest and always
seems to save the female from anything she couldn’t handle. The Princess is
beautiful, always innocent and does what she's told. Is that the messages
Disney Movies wanted to make children think life’s all about? Getting told what
to do just because you’re a woman?
You will find little aspects in life where you never
knew stereotypes were hidden that seem to reinforce those stereotypes
in society. Times have changed but it seems these classic childrens films have not and therefore may mean that these stereotypes and expectations stay around for a long time to come!"Society and Culture at Stella
was created and is updated by Katie Price and students at Stella Maris College, Manly, NSW.
Showing posts with label Socialisation Factors. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Socialisation Factors. Show all posts
Monday, 6 August 2012
Women, race and stereotypes... what message is Disney giving girls today?
Disney Movie Princesses: what
messages do they send out to young girls on how to be a woman and will it lead to 'happily ever after' today? Danielle reviewed these questions using examples of Disney characters.
Monday, 23 April 2012
A real man...
Thanks to Camille for this excellent discussion:
Herein lies our paradox.
Jackson Katz’ book, The Macho
Paradox, profoundly challenges the definition of manhood. Are men real men when
violence against women is involved physically and verbally? Are men programmed
to be violent or are people naturally violent?
Are you a real man? Do you know someone who is a ‘real’ man?
1. Are
they chivalrous and respectful? That’s pretty ‘manly.’
OR
2. Are
they disrespectful to women and constantly put them down? That seems to be
pretty ‘manly’ these days too.
Herein lies our paradox.
Jackson Katz’ book, The Macho
Paradox, profoundly challenges the definition of manhood. Are men real men when
violence against women is involved physically and verbally? Are men programmed
to be violent or are people naturally violent?
Society and culture are
highlighted repeatedly in this book. Concepts of gender and power are major
features, as men fearing women constantly slam women to defend their
‘masculinity.’ Are men brought up this way, passed down by enculturation? Has
violence against women accelerated along with the technology that allows access
to the 10,000 porn videos released in the U.S.A every year? This pattern has
led people to evaluate continuity and change that come with gender violence and
how societies can prevent it.
From Eminem to high school sex
scandals, this type of violence concerns every individual and influences them
to make decisions. This is not a ‘women’s issue’, it is something that men play
a role in too and it should be acknowledged. True manhood most certainly
shouldn’t involve harming of another human being. Jackson Katz’ discusses
hundreds of factors more on this topic from personal experiences to
quantitative data. He also acknowledges the book called the ‘Cinderella
complex’, where it claims that very independent women still desire to be
protected by a male. The gender stereotypes are overwhelming and cease to end!
The Macho Paradox proves to be as complex and puzzling as society and culture
itself.
See the powerpoint accompanying this here.
Tuesday, 3 April 2012
Race in TV
Thanks to Marianne for this review of current issues of race and culture in TV media.
The article relates to society and culture concepts because it highlights cultural stereotypes and the power the media has to dictate what is put on television; people are highly influenced by what we see in the media. This also links to continuity and change because Australia has become a more multicultural country in the last 20 years, so we should therefore portray this image on TV. However, the media still perceives the Australian audience to be intolerant to other races and believes we would rather see white people on TV.
TV networks and advertisers argue that they are worried that
white Australians will tune out if there is more ethnic mix in the media,
despite 2009 census revealing that 44% of Australians are born overseas or have
at least one foreign born parent. Hence, Australia would be more accepting of
other cultures and more ethnic groups might watch shows if they were being
represented on television. A professor of sociology also claims that media are
worried that they may portray ethnic races in a way that people may deem as
offensive and so they stick to the white, ‘mainstream model’.
Read the full article from The Vine.
Major television networks are accused of TV racism as it is
believed that there are few roles on commercial television for people from
Australia’s ethnic mix. Soap operas such as ‘Packed to the Rafters’ and ‘Home
and Away’ are being criticized for ‘Racial Tokenism’ as well as reality game shows
and news/panel/chat shows which are being described as very anglo-centric.
Multicultural Arts Australia also say that when there is racial diversity it
usually depicts cultural stereotypes which is being labelled ‘Colour Blind
Casting’. A lot of ethnic actors are portrayed as the villain, eg Middle Eastern actors are portrayed as drug
dealers and‘Wog criminals.’
Sunday, 4 March 2012
Parents raise a 'gender-less' child
"Sex is what is 'between the legs' and gender is what is 'between the ears' "
This is quite a nice differentitation between sex and gender for the purpose of our understanding, but has been taken a stage further for a couple and their most recent child in Canada.
They have not told anyone what sex the baby is and will raise him/her as neither a girl or a boy, so that he/she may make their own choice on their gender.
Read one of the news reports on this here.
Clinical psychologist Dr Brenda Todd , a senior lecturer at City University , said the experiment has been tried before in the 1970s by a feminist academic and her husband, with limited success.
"When the child gets older, the influence of the peer group is much stronger than that of the family so, like it or not, it will become gender aware."
Dr Todd pointed to research she and a colleague did on children between the ages of nine months and 36 months.
"We found that they really did have stereotypical preferences even at that age, with the girls going for teddy bears and dolls and the boys going for balls and cars."
Find other reports on this and think about:
- Do you agree with what the parents are doing?
- Why do you think they have chosen to raise a genderless child?
- What benefits or problems do you think this could bring to the child as they grow up?
They have not told anyone what sex the baby is and will raise him/her as neither a girl or a boy, so that he/she may make their own choice on their gender.
Read one of the news reports on this here.
Clinical psychologist Dr Brenda Todd , a senior lecturer at City University , said the experiment has been tried before in the 1970s by a feminist academic and her husband, with limited success.
"When the child gets older, the influence of the peer group is much stronger than that of the family so, like it or not, it will become gender aware."
Dr Todd pointed to research she and a colleague did on children between the ages of nine months and 36 months.
"We found that they really did have stereotypical preferences even at that age, with the girls going for teddy bears and dolls and the boys going for balls and cars."
Find other reports on this and think about:
- Do you agree with what the parents are doing?
- Why do you think they have chosen to raise a genderless child?
- What benefits or problems do you think this could bring to the child as they grow up?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
